English 
Spanish 
French 
A New Phase in EU Sustainability Legislation
The European Parliament CSRD CSDDD updates introduced through the Omnibus I Directive mark a turning point in the evolution of EU sustainability regulation. While attention earlier in 2025 focused on the Stop-the-Clock Directive, the Parliament’s new position offers targeted improvements to CSRD and CSDDD aimed at increasing clarity, reducing overlaps, and supporting more consistent implementation. These updates show that the EU remains committed to strong ESG requirements while responding to business concerns about regulatory complexity and practical compliance.
The message is clear: Europe is not pulling back from ESG, it is refining the frameworks to improve usability and reinforce accountability.
What the European Parliament’s CSRD and CSDDD Updates Mean for Companies.
The Omnibus I Directive is designed to address a challenge often raised across boardrooms and audit committees: not the existence of ESG regulations, but the complexity of applying them consistently.
Its objectives include:
• improving the usability of sustainability legislation
• reducing legal uncertainty around ESG scope and thresholds
• harmonizing overlapping frameworks across reporting and due diligence
• supporting cross-border companies operating under multiple regulatory regimes
This Directive does not replace CSRD or CSDDD. Instead, it strengthens them by closing the gaps that practitioners have been highlighting for the past two years. It is a policy correction informed by real-world implementation challenges — a sign that ESG policy is maturing from design to execution.
Key Omnibus I Changes Affecting CSRD and CSDDD Compliance
The European Parliament’s suggested refinements bring several important improvements.
1. Clearer Definitions of Scope and Thresholds
One of the most common questions from non-EU groups has been whether and how their European subsidiaries fall under CSRD. The new position provides greater clarity, reducing the interpretive grey areas that previously made risk assessments difficult. This clarity is especially important for global companies coordinating reporting across multiple jurisdictions.
2. Alignment with the ESRS Simplification Agenda
The Parliament supports the broader 2025 initiative to streamline ESRS. Many companies — even large, well-resourced issuers — reported early challenges navigating the depth of disclosures. The simplification initiative, combined with Omnibus I’s refinements, shifts the focus to quality and decision-usefulness over volume.
3. Coherence Across the ESG Regulatory Landscape
CSRD does not exist in isolation. It intersects with:
• CSDDD due diligence processes
• EU Taxonomy requirements
• sector-specific environmental and social obligations
The Parliament emphasizes harmonization to reduce duplicate reporting and conflicting interpretations. This is a significant step toward integrated sustainability governance — something many companies have been advocating since CSRD’s adoption.
How the Parliament’s CSDDD Updates Strengthen Due Diligence
CSDDD implementation has been particularly challenging due to the complexity of global supply chains. The Parliament’s updated position responds to concerns voiced by companies, auditors, and civil-society groups.
1. More Practical Due Diligence Expectations
The amendments aim to replace ambiguous obligations with clearer expectations for supplier engagement, risk management, and remediation actions. This creates more consistency across industries, where due diligence maturity varies widely.
2. Streamlined Enforcement Across Member States
Uneven enforcement undermines investor confidence and creates competitive distortions. The Parliament’s position prioritizes consistency, addressing an issue many sustainability leaders identified as a major barrier to effective implementation.
3. A Stronger Connection Between Reporting and Action
The alignment of CSDDD with CSRD is one of the most significant technical improvements. Companies will be able to integrate their due diligence systems with their reporting
Omnibus I vs. Stop-the-Clock: What’s the Difference?
It is critical to distinguish the Omnibus I Directive from the Stop-the-Clock Directive adopted earlier in April 2025.
Stop-the-Clock
- Paused new ESRS (sector-specific)
- Gave companies more time to prepare
- Aimed at reducing short-term reporting pressure
Omnibus I
- Introduces targeted amendments to CSRD & CSDDD
- Aims for simplification, consistency, and legal clarity
- Does not delay existing CSRD obligations
In other words:
Stop-the-Clock = timeline adjustment.
Omnibus I = scope clarification + simplification.
Both are part of the EU’s parallel strategy to maintain ambition while responding to market feedback.
Why the Latest CSRD and CSDDD Updates Matter for ESG Leaders
The implications for sustainability professionals extend beyond compliance.
1. Increased Regulatory Predictability
The clearer thresholds and definitions help ESG teams plan multi-year reporting strategies with greater confidence. Predictability also supports investment decision-making, internal budgeting, and technology adoption.
2. A More Integrated Approach to ESG Governance
The improved alignment between CSRD and CSDDD encourages companies to break down silos between sustainability, risk, procurement, and compliance teams. This shift mirrors the broader global trend: ESG is becoming embedded into corporate governance, not treated as an isolated reporting exercise.
3. Growing Demand for Specialized ESG Expertise
Despite simplification, the expectations remain demanding. Companies increasingly require professionals skilled in:
• double materiality assessment
• value chain risk analysis
• ESG data architecture
• sustainability assurance
• reporting standard interoperability
Training programs — including the Online Certificate on Sustainability (ESG) Reporting and the Certified Sustainability Practitioner Program –2026 Advanced Edition in March 12 & 13 2025 play a critical role in helping professionals meet these evolving requirements.
What Happens Next?
The Parliament’s position now enters trilogue negotiations with the Council and the Commission. A final Omnibus I Directive may emerge in 2026, potentially accompanied by more technical guidance for companies.
Forward-looking organizations should:
• track updates closely, especially threshold recalibrations
• continue CSRD preparation under current ESRS
• build integrated reporting and due diligence systems
• advance team capabilities ahead of regulatory tightening
The companies best positioned for the next regulatory cycle are those investing early in systems, data, and people — not those waiting for final texts.
FAQs
Is Omnibus I a replacement for CSRD or CSDDD?
No. It updates both directives but preserves their core structure and intent.
Does Omnibus I delay reporting obligations?
No. Only the Stop-the-Clock Directive affected timelines.
Will these amendments reduce reporting requirements?
Not substantially. Instead, they improve clarity and usability, allowing companies to comply more efficiently.
Final Thoughts
The European Parliament CSRD CSDDD updates mark a meaningful step toward more coherent and actionable sustainability regulation. The EU is not softening its ESG ambitions. It is shaping a framework designed to work in practice, not just on paper.
In essence: The EU is not slowing ESG progress. It is refining it.
For companies and ESG practitioners, this moment offers more than regulatory insight. It offers the chance to build smarter, integrated sustainability systems that turn compliance into long-term strategic advantage.
