The EU’s Omnibus Simplification Package

The EU’s Omnibus Simplification Package: A Step Forward or a Step Backward for Sustainability?

The European Union plans to officially unveil the Omnibus Simplification Package on February 26, 2025, sparking widespread debate over its potential impact on corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence. This legislative overhaul is part of the EU’s broader effort to simplify regulations and enhance competitiveness.

Leaked documents suggest that the package significantly scales back corporate disclosure mandates under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). Proponents argue that these changes will reduce administrative burdens on businesses. However, critics warn that these revisions amount to deregulation rather than simplification, ultimately weakening corporate accountability for ESG issues.

The Need for Simplification

In 2024, the Draghi Report outlined key regulatory hurdles that hinder European companies from scaling up and competing on a global level. Mario Draghi, former European Central Bank President, emphasized that restrictive and inconsistent regulations push many European entrepreneurs to seek investment opportunities outside the EU, particularly in the U.S. To address this, the EU launched the Competitiveness Compass, a framework aimed at making regulatory processes more efficient while maintaining core sustainability commitments.

Despite the push for simplification, sustainability regulations, particularly CSRD and CSDDD, have faced significant opposition from various stakeholders, including U.S. politicians and European businesses, who argue that compliance costs are high and overly complex. At the same time, civil society groups and sustainability advocates stress that weakening these directives could undermine progress in ESG transparency and corporate responsibility.

Key Changes in the Leaked Draft

Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)

• The threshold for mandatory reporting would increase from 250 employees to 1,000 employees, reducing the number of affected companies by approximately 85%.
• The revenue threshold for applicability would be raised to €450 million (US$471 million).
• Reporting requirements for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) would be eliminated.
• Sector-specific reporting standards, previously expected by mid-2025, would be scrapped.
• The implementation of CSRD would be delayed by a year, further postponing corporate sustainability disclosures.

Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD)

• Due diligence obligations would apply only to companies with more than 500 employees (previously 250 employees).
• The proposal would reduce the frequency of supply chain monitoring from annual assessments to once every five years.
•  It would also remove civil liability for non-compliance, limiting legal repercussions for violations.
• The proposal eliminates due diligence requirements for financial institutions

EU Taxonomy and Carbon Border Tax

• The leaked documents do not explicitly mention changes to the EU Taxonomy. However, reports suggest there could be potential adjustments to streamline sustainability classifications.
• Officials anticipate modifications to the Carbon Border Tax, though details remain unspecified in the leak.

The proposed changes have sparked widespread debate across industries, academia, and advocacy groups. Many experts believe these revisions significantly undermine corporate ESG commitments.

Andreas Rasche, a professor and associate dean at Copenhagen Business School, criticized the opaque decision-making process. He expressed disappointment, noting, “This is very disappointing and not at all proportionate. The document lacks evidence-based justifications, and the process was neither transparent nor inclusive.”

Similarly, Maria van der Heide, Head of EU Policy at ShareAction, labeled the changes as “reckless.” She argues that they represent deregulation rather than simplification.

María Mendiluce, CEO of the We Mean Business Coalition, highlighted the larger consequences of the proposal. She warned: “What’s at stake is more than regulatory fine-tuning—reducing reporting requirements could obscure crucial insights into corporate risks and opportunities.

Implications for Businesses

For businesses, particularly multinational corporations, the proposed changes could have mixed effects:

• Reduced Compliance Burdens: Fewer companies will need to comply with the CSRD and CSDDD, alleviating administrative and financial pressures, especially for SMEs.
• Weakened ESG Accountability: A lower frequency of supply chain monitoring and the removal of civil liability could reduce incentives for companies to rigorously uphold human rights and environmental standards.
• Investor Concerns: Institutional investors who prioritize ESG metrics may find it harder to assess company performance due to less stringent reporting requirements.
• Regulatory Uncertainty: With the European Parliament expected to scrutinize and potentially amend the final proposal, businesses must remain prepared for further regulatory shifts.

The EU’s move to streamline sustainability regulations has reignited a critical debate on balancing regulatory efficiency with corporate accountability. Reducing administrative burdens may boost European competitiveness.

However, many worry that these changes could undermine progress in corporate sustainability transparency. In the coming months, it will be crucial to see if the EU can effectively balance simplification with its long-term sustainability objectives.

Don’t miss the chance to attend the Europe – Asia | Certified Sustainability (ESG) Practitioner Program, Advanced Edition, on May 22-23 & 26 . Position yourself as a leader in the evolving ESG landscape and stay informed about the latest regulatory shifts.

Contact us here